Part 9. Some Healthcare Fraudsters are Repeat Offenders
Some of those accused of perpetrating healthcare fraud seem to make a habit of it.
In 2000 The Globe and Mail reported that 12 doctors were charged with fraud over $5,000 and with conspiracy to commit fraud. These charges arose from a variety of fraudulent activities including billing for services not rendered and for unnecessary referrals to specialists. The OPP estimated that the fraud amounted to about $2 million just in the year 1997. The doctors charged all worked at a walk-in clinic owned by one of the doctors charged. In 2003 this doctor was committed to stand trial on fraud charges but in 2005 The Ontario Superior Court of Justice granted his application to quash his committal.
Fast-forward sixteen years later, the CBC reported that this same doctor was charged with fraud over $5,000 in a scheme involving unnecessarily referring patients to doctors at a walk-in clinic that he owns (at the same address as the last one, but with a different name). This clinic’s website promises “rapid access to medical specialists”. I’ll bet. CPSO (the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) lists this doctor as an active member.
In January of 2017, CPSO found that a psychiatrist was guilty of a number of acts of professional misconduct including what the College is pleased to call “inappropriate billing practices” (the rest of us call it fraud) including:
- billing for missed appointments
- billing for cancelled appointments (including one the doctor cancelled)
- billing for telephone calls to patients
- billing for telephone prescription renewals
- billing for session lengths some of which were more than double the standard
- billing ineligible premium codes
- double billing for the same block of time
The College did not revoke his license for his “inappropriate billing practices” nor for his failure to “maintain the standard of practice of the profession”, and this despite disciplinary action having been taken against him just three years previously for sexual misconduct with patients. He still maintains his psychiatric practice in Ottawa.
Then there’s the case of the doctor whom CPSO found guilty of various offenses including “inappropriately prescribed high quantities of narcotic medications with too many repeats” as well as not properly monitoring those patients to whom he had prescribed the narcotics. He failed to provide reasons for ordering tests and changing patients’ medications, and he even prescribed drugs to a patient he hadn’t even seen. The College suspended his license for two months and told him he couldn’t prescribe narcotics any more. After the suspension was up, he continued to practice. That was December 2010.
In 2016 they hauled him up before the disciplinary committee again, this time for having pled guilty to criminal charges of defrauding OHIP to the tune of $483,916 (and then fibbing about it on a College form). He resigned his registration with the College. He, at least, is no longer in practice.
But our own personal favourite recidivist fraudster is Dr. Ranjit Kumar Chandra who reputedly fabricated “research” results and then invented another researcher who confirmed Chandra’s results. That’s carrying having imaginary friends a little too far and he was stripped of his Order of Canada appointment in December of 2015. In August 2016, Chandra was charged with fraud over $5,000 in an alleged scheme to defraud OHIP. I’ll say it was over $5,000! The Toronto Sun puts the number at around $2 million. Police say he paid patients to provide their OHIP numbers (and the OHIP numbers of their relatives and friends) and would then bill OHIP for treatments that he seldom or never provided, and often when he was out of the country. CPSO got around to suspending his license in February 2017 by which time he’d already beat a hasty retreat, reportedly to India.
But it is a matter of small wonder that there are those in the healthcare field who view committing fraud as a low-risk proposition when you consider that, even when they are caught and convicted, the penalties meted out to the offenders are so light as to be a bad joke in dubious taste.
Take, for instance, the April 2018 case of two pharmacists in Alberta who pled guilty to taking “secret commissions” of more than $300,000 (and those of us who have no truck with euphemisms call “secret commissions” bribes or kickbacks). They were ordered to pay some restitution and they each got house arrest for six months followed by a curfew. One of the pharmacists continues to work, and the other returned to a farm in Saskatchewan. No jail time.
Another example is a doctor who defrauded OHIP of $597,760 and WSIB of $2.9 million over a four year period. This doctor claimed that the “improper billing” was the result of a failure of due diligence. He pled guilty in the Ontario Court of Justice, paid a fine, and made partial restitution prior to his court hearing. CPSO ordered a three month suspension, a reprimand, an education program, OHIP billing monitoring and costs. No prison time, no revocation of his medical license. He’s currently practicing in Toronto.
Another doctor was found guilty by the Ontario Court of Justice of fraud amounting to $75,000 over a period of four years. He received a conditional sentence, probation and was ordered to make full restitution by the court. The Discipline Committee ordered a 12month suspension, with a six month (but with the suspension period to be cut in half if he ponied up $7,500 to the College within six months). No jail time.
No prison time and no revocation of a criminal doctor’s or pharmacist’s license is not much of a deterrent.
But not all government agencies regard fraud so tolerantly. A woman in BC was recently sentenced to 4-1/2 years in jail for teaching people how to evade taxes. Just last year, a Toronto lawyer was sentenced to 3-1/2 years in jail for defrauding condo investors. A few months ago, a University of Toronto student was sent to jail for 13 months for defrauding CRA. A driver for a vending machine company was convicted of stealing about $20,000 from his employer and was sentenced to four months in jail and was ordered to pay full restitution.
I guess if you want to commit fraud without going to jail, you’d better get some qualifications in the healthcare field.
So what do Canadians think about this situation? Find out in part 10 of our series.
John Robert Lyons says
Harvard\’s Malcolm Sparrow researched fraud in the mid 1990s and criticized the contemporary linear approach to fraud controls. His regulatory problem-solving approach first introduced in \”The Regulatory Craft\”, and again for dealing with harms incidents in \”A License to Steal\” go largely ignored. No-more-so than in Ontario where senior managers rebuffed efforts of program area employees to apply Sparrow\’s insights, opting to accept the recommendations made by a consulting firm who gave them what they wanted to hear.
Even in conventional terms, compare efforts with other developed countries (United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, Germany and the United States). It doesn\’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that, comparatively, efforts across Canada to counter misuse,abuse and predatory fraud are off the charts weak.
Add to this, an apparent lack of curiousness to recent science from psychology, neuroscience, social physics, human evolutionary biology and behavioral insights that can be applied to reducing financial loses.